Reacting to ESPN’s NFL redraft: Why it’s ultimately flawed
Positional value
There are four “premium” positions in the modern NFL. Quarterbacks, offensive tackles, cornerbacks and pass rushers are the positions that dominate the NFL, as well as the top ten of drafts. In this draft scenario, these are truly the only four positions that warrant first round selections.
Age and durability are two factors that have to be taken into account when selecting a non quarterback in the first round. To take a position player that high, you need to be able to guarantee at least three years of elite production. While tackles like Andrew Whitworth are great, there is no guarantee that he plays more than one season in this scenario.
For no reason should a team take a non-premium position in the first round. Wide receivers, running backs, off-ball linebackers, tight ends and interior defensive lineman who do not rush the passer should not be on any team’s board in round one. Exceptions can be made for teams picking in the last four or five picks who will pick again rather quickly in the snake draft format.
In the original ESPN version, six of these players were taken in the first round. The highest was Panthers running back Christian McCaffrey being taken by the Los Angeles Rams with the 20th overall pick. A running back in the first round? Blasphemous. The Rams haul ended up being Bobby Wagner, Jared Goff and Dante Fowler after the first round pick of McCaffrey. They ended up with two elite players at non-premium positions and their worst player drafted is their quarterback.